A- de 2017
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Alejandro Linares Cantillo
✓Claimant Alfredo De La Cruz Molano Bravo
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Se rechaza por falta de legitimación
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Recusación formulada en contra de los Magistrados María Victoria Calle Correa y Luis Ernesto Vargas Silva.
Examinado el expediente constató la Sala Plena que el peticionario no intervino en el proceso de constitucionalidad y que dicho hecho conllevaba a que careciera de legitimidad para formular la recusación.
Consecuentemente dispuso RECHAZAR la misma, por falta de pertinencia.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- Primero. RECHAZAR por falta de pertinencia la recusación presentada por el ciudadano Alfredo de la Cruz Molano Bravo contra el Magistrado Luis Ernesto Vargas Silva y la Magistrada María Victoria Calle Correa.
- Segundo. Contra esta providencia no procede recurso alguno.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.